Gen is on the left on all pictures. Right off the bat the rep has the usual “issues”:

  • 1/10 sec subdial on the left is a 24h dial with wrong scale

  • dial is printed

  • color slightly off, it is lighter and shinier

  • plastic is very cheap and with some mold smudges and gaps in seams (don’t get me wrong the gen is still plastic but the edges are sharper, more precise and not gaps)

  • lume is non existent on rep (and weak on gen)

  • strap quality is close to gen, print are correct but less precise, almost smudgier, stitching is better on gen

  • back case smudginess feeling in the print/engraving is also present on the rep. I did not check if it is an actual battery cover or not

Overall all these “issues” became more obvious when put next to the gen and gives it an even more pronounced cheap feeling, however I still think that the rep is worth it for 28USD, especially if you don’t have access to gen and with a new strap.

Written by u/Ancient-Pressure-565 who then deleted their account for some reason.

r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison
r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison
r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison
r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison
r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison
r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison
r/ChinaTime - Moonswatch from luxurywatchsu1 comparison

Here are som

Rate this post

Average rating 4.5 / 5. Vote count: 2

See also  A Comparison of the Omega Seamaster 300